Neophytou v. Vlamis Neophytou (Appeal No. 1/20)
DECISION
OIKONOMOU.D: The hearing of the appellant for an order modification of sustenance and the counter-claim by the respondent were conducted on the basis of “written testimony”, according to D.30 ch 5(5). However, the written declarations deposited for this purpose did not provide statements under oath, nor of legal confirmation, as it is indicated in subsection (5)(i) of the relevant regulation. As a result, the Court [of First Instance?] rejected both the first application and the counterclaim, deeming that there was no witness material before it.
